![]() This makes the setup complicated for most people. USB, wired network and WiFi, XPressNet and LocoNet, all kinds of busses. "What I don't like is that it tries to be too much at the same time. "Sometimes there are issues with the USB-connector or other components If you want to reduce costs by using cheap components that is not the right way to go, but that is what I heard from resellers in the Netherlands. I asked him more about his dislike for it and this is what he told me. He is however primarily a Mac user and the DR5000 can't be configured on Mac, which is part of his issue. The iTrain developer especially doesn't like it and says it caused him a lot of headaches. The DR5000 is widely used but many bugs are mentioned. Per Iain on the iTrain forum "This is because iTrain is truly multiplatform and uses the underlying Java platform to work in the same way for all platforms.". But reading about other peoples experiences I don't see people complaining about this so it's probably not the issue. However the Digikeijs system doesn't seem to play well with Mac so I'm still working out how to test this. I'd like to test this by running iTrain on a very nice Macbook that my wife has but doesn't use. I have no specific reason to say this, but it's a possibility, and therefore a doubt (a potential variable?). I like iTrain, but I have a small doubt that it's made mainly for Mac and may be glitchy on PC. What I want is to have a stable, minimilly glitchy setup that I can use for many years. So when there's glitchiness (and there is), I can't tell which of the three is responsible. I have the disadvantage that I've started using three complicated systems at the same time - DCC, controllers, block detection, and automation software. I'm still not sure what that will be - PC, Mac, or RasPi. I'm planning on running my layout using a designated device. I have often installed Linux on old laptops to get them a second lease on life. I do think that Linux is better than Windows for that, especially on an old computer. What I am going to write is just an opinion, based on personal feelings. that can react to sudden events very quickly, without latency, even if these events don't happen often (two events within one second is like an eternity for a computer). We need a system that is responsive, i.e. ![]() I have never seen Rocrail require more than 2 or 3% of CPU power, but that's probably not the right metric. What computer parameters would be ideal for running software like this to it's limit with as few glitches as possible? It seems to jam or just get things wrong from time to time. I would have thought it would be good enough for train automation. I'm running iTrain on an old Lenovo Thinkpad that I got free from a previous job. But I wonder what the ideal computer would be to run this stuff. ![]() I'm guessing not that much if a RasPi can handle it. Watching the trains move and all the planning on the switchboard I got to wondering what kind of computing power is needed for this. I got four trains running completely autonomously. I spent hours trying to solve it, but couldn't, so I just removed the yard line, and started playing with the automation. Trains weren't stopping on one particular yard line. I had a long day trying to trouble shoot a problem on my practice layout. The DR4018 was a bit difficult to program and reset, so I think this will be an improvement. I think mentioned before that that was on the way. I don't have it, but reading the specs it seems that it is programmable via Bluetooth using their app (instead of via DCC and CVs). Digikeijs has a new accessory decoder, the DK50018.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |